support@ipinnovative.com

Panacea Journal of Medical Sciences

Panacea Journal of Medical Sciences (PJMS) open access, peer-reviewed triannually journal publishing since 2011 and is published under auspices of the “NKP Salve Institute of Medical Sciences and Research Centre”. With the aim of faster and better dissemination of knowledge, we will be publishing the article ‘Ahead of Print’ immediately on acceptance. In addition, the journal would allow free access (Open Access) to its contents, which is likely to attract more readers and citations to articles published in PJMS.Manuscripts must be prepared in accordance with “Uniform requiremen...

Prevalence of thrombocytopenia among Indian patients across different cities in India

  • Author Details:   
  • Parmila Malik * ,  
  • Atul Khajuria ,  
  • Jyotsana Khattri ,  
  • Lalit Singh ,  
  • Veeresh VG

Introduction

Thrombocytopenia, which signifies a low platelet count usually below 150 × 109/L, a number of causes lead to thrombocytopenia, like drug induced, heparin induced, neonatal factors, gestational, chemothepeutic and viral, Drug induced thrombocytopenia is clinical disorder, caused due to administration of therapeutic drugs for management of various diseases. More than 300 drugs are identified that can cause drug induced thrombocytopenia,[1] the symptoms may begin in 5 to 10 days of drug administration, even with single dose administration can cause immediate effects, the stopping of drugs for 1 to 2 days can recover the patients from complication related to drug effects, the common drugs that lead to drug induced thrombocytopenia are quinidine, vancomycin oxaliiplatin, suramin, abciximab, tirofiban, heparin, pencillin, sulfonamide, statins, ranitidine, NSAIDs’.

Heparin is the drug used for thromboprophylaxis in cardiovascular diseases, neuro disorders, dialysis, extracorporeal circulation, but the drug has adverse effect and patients are at risk of developing, heparin induced thrombocytopenia, [2], [3] Heparin induced thrombocytopenia is clinical disorder, caused due to immune mediated adverse reaction resulted from emergence of antibodies which activated micro particles of platelets in presence of heparin.

Platelets are formed in blood by 5 weeks sooner than within 30 weeks the platelets are fully functional and help in repair and reformulation of neonate structures, due to immune mediate, alloimmune and maternal antibodies the decrease in platelets occur within 72 hours of birth, this thrombocytopenia can be mild, moderate and severe, if the onset is later 72 hours can cause intraventricular hemorrhage. The mild and moderate neonatal thrombocytopenia resolves within 10days. If severe case needs better investigation and management. [4], [5]

Gestational thrombocytopenia is condition with platelets count less than 50000 in a pregnant women, the incidence is asymptomatic and occurs in second half of pregnancy, [6], [7] in the absence of history of thrombocytopenia the of platelets count returns to normal level within two months of postpartum.[8] The gestational thrombocytopenia is not associated with maternal or fetal risk.[9] Even after less risk for mother and child the gestational thrombocytopenia can be serious issue and can cause potential problems [10] to mother during labor and postpartum period,

Thrombocytopenia, an abnormally low blood platelet count, is a common side effect of myelosuppressive chemotherapy. [11], [12], [13] Prior studies estimated that approximately 10% to 38% of patients with a solid tumor and 40% to 68% of patients with a hematologic malignancy experience thrombocytopenia.[14], [15], [16], [17] The incidence and prevalence of chemotherapy induced thrombocytopenia vary greatly by type of cancer and chemotherapy regimen, for example, from 16% in head and neck cancer to 68% in hematologic cancers, and from 8% in taxane based regimens to 37% in gemcitabine based regimens and 82% in carboplatin monotherapy.[12], [13], [17], [18] Gemcitabine based and platinum based regimens have consistently been associated with the highest risk of thrombocytopenia. [11], [12], [14] In solid tumor patients, the highest prevalence of thrombocytopenia was observed in patients with colorectal cancer, followed by non-small cell lung cancer, and ovarian cancer. [13] Currently, there are no standardized guidelines for the prevention or treatment of chemotherapy induced thrombocytopenia. To reduce the risk of bleeding or need for transfusions among patients with severe chemotherapy induced thrombocytopenia, chemotherapy dose is typically modified, which may decrease relative dose intensity and reduce treatment efficacy.

Viral infection induced thrombocytopenia is a common finding following or during many viral infections. Mild thrombocytopenia, combined with lymphopenia in a patient with signs and symptoms of an infectious disease, raises the suspicion of a viral infection. This phenomenon is classically attributed to platelet consumption due to inflammation-induced coagulation, sequestration from the circulation by phagocytosis and hypersplenism, and impaired platelet production due to defective megakaryopoiesis or cytokine-induced myelosuppression. Platelets as passive bystanders during viral infection. Platelets are increasingly recognized as active players in the (antiviral) immune response and have been shown to interact with cells of the innate and adaptive immune system as well as directly with viruses. [19]

The present study assesses the various causes and prevalence of these factor in thrombocytopenia in selected cites of North India.

Objectives

The present study aimed to assess the prevalence of prevalence of thrombocytopenia in Indian patients.

Materials and Methods

A survey study designed to assess the prevalence of thrombocytopenia among patients in multiple cities at north India the cities selected are Lakhimpur, Panipat, Sonipat, Gohana, Delhi for a period of 11 months from January 2022 to November 2022. A total of 22832 patients samples from 5 cities were selected from different diagnostic centers, of these 1295 blood samples showed the prevalence of thrombocytopenia, of which 5440 samples of which 261 showed thrombocytopenia caused due to drug used for treatment, 2860 samples studied 109 showed thrombocytopenia due to heparin, 3250 samples of which 112 showed thrombocytopenia due to neonatal complication, 3952 samples of which 137 showed thrombocytopenia due gestational, 1745 samples of which 281 showed thrombocytopenia due to chemo-drugs use, 5585 samples of which 395 showed thrombocytopenia due to viral infection.

Results

The present study designed to assess the prevalence of thrombocytopenia among Indian patients. The following are the findings of the study identifying various causes for thrombocytopenia among Indian

S.No

Cause

Number of patients samples collected

Number of patients samples identified thrombocytopenia

Percentage of prevalence

1

Drug induced thrombocytopenia

5440

261

4.7

2

Heparin induced thrombocytopenia

2860

109

3.8

3

Neonatal thrombocytopenia

3250

112

3.4

4

Gestational thrombocytopenia

3952

137

3.4

5

Chemotherapeutic thrombocytopenia

1745

281

16.0

6

Viral infection induced thrombocytopenia

5585

395

7.0

Total

22832

1295

5.6

Table 1 Describes the distribution of the prevalence of thrombocytopenia among Indian patients at various cities under study.

The data is graphically represented in column bar diagram showing the total number of samples collected and number of positive thrombocytopenia samples identified due to various causes among Indian patients under study.([Table 1])

The prevalence rate of various causes are as follows,

The prevalence of g induced drug thrombocytopenia

S.No

City

Number of samples

Number of drug induced thrombocytopenia

Percentage

1

Lakhimpur

1050

39

3.7

2

Panipat

1465

66

4.5

3

Sonipat

815

63

7.7

4

Gohana

845

40

4.7

5

Delhi

1265

53

4.1

Total

5440

261

4.7

Table 2 Describes the distribution of the drug induced thrombocytopenia cases at various cities under study.

The study found that prevalence of drug-induced thrombocytopenia in total samples of 5440, at Lakhimpur is 3.7%, Panipat is 4.5%, Sonipat is 7.7%, Gohana is 4.7%, Delhi is 4.1% respectively and total prevalence of drug-induced thrombocytopenia in North India is 4.7%.([Table 2])

The prevalence of heparin induced thrombocytopenia

S.No

City

Number of samples

Number of heparin induced thrombocytopenia

Percentage

1

Lakhimpur

547

16

2.9

2

Panipat

755

27

3.5

3

Sonipat

654

29

4.4

4

Gohana

259

12

4.6

5

Delhi

645

25

3.8

Total

2860

109

3.8

Table 3 Describes the distribution of the heparin-induced thrombocytopenia cases at various cities under study.

The study found that prevalence of heparin induced thrombocytopenia in total samples of 2860, at Lakhimpur is 2.9%, Panipat is 3.5%, Sonipat is 4.4%, Gohana is 4.6%, Delhi is 3.8% respectively and total prevalence of heparin induced thrombocytopenia is 3.8%.([Table 3])

The prevalence of neonatal thrombocytopenia

S.No

City

Number of samples

Number of neonatal thrombocytopenia

Percentage

1

Lakhimpur

545

20

3.6

2

Panipat

778

31

3.9

3

Sonipat

865

32

3.6

4

Gohana

497

13

2.6

5

Delhi

565

16

2.8

Total

3250

112

3.4

Table 4 Describes the distribution of the neonatal thrombocytopenia cases at various cities under study.

The study found that prevalence of neonatal thrombocytopenia in total samples of 3250, at Lakhimpur is 3.6%, Panipat is 3.9%, Sonipat is 3.6%, Gohana is 2.6%, Delhi is 2.8% respectively and total prevalence of gestational thrombocytopenia is 3.4%.([Table 4])

The prevalence of gestational thrombocytopenia

S.No

City

Number of samples

Number of gestational thrombocytopenia

Percentage

1

Lakhimpur

645

28

4.3

2

Panipat

978

39

3.9

3

Sonipat

967

36

3.7

4

Gohana

597

15

2.5

5

Delhi

765

19

2.4

Total

3952

137

3.4

Table 5 Describes the distribution of the gestational thrombocytopenia cases at various cities under study.

The study found that prevalence of gestational thrombocytopenia in total samples of 3952, at Lakhimpur is 4.3%, Panipat is 3.9%, India is 3.7%, Gohana is 2.5%, Delhi is 2.4% respectively and total prevalence of gestational thrombocytopenia represented is 3.4%.([Table 5])

The prevalence of chemotherapeutic drug induced thrombocytopenia

S.No

City

Number of patients samples

Number of chemo-drug induced thrombocytopenic

Percentage

1

Lakhimpur

268

37

13.80

2

Panipat

357

76

21.28

3

Sonipat

384

68

17.70

4

Gohana

291

32

10.99

5

Delhi

445

68

15.28

Total

1745

281

16.01

Table 6 Describes the distribution of the prevalence of thrombocytopenia among patients who were on chemotherapeutic drug at various cities under study.

The study found that prevalence of thrombocytopenia among patients who were on chemotherapeutic drug at various cities for total sample of 1745, at Lakhimpur 13.80%, Panipat 21.28%, Sonipat 17.70%, Gohana 10.99%, Delhi 15.28% respectively and total prevalence of thrombocytopenia among patients who were on chemotherapeutic drug at various cities under study in North India is 16.01%.([Table 6])

The prevalence of viral infection induced thrombocytopenia

S.No

City

Number of patients samples

Number of viral infected patients developed thrombocytopenic

Percentage

1

Lakhimpur

960

48

5.00

2

Panipat

1345

118

8.77

3

Sonipat

1357

85

6.26

4

Gohana

758

49

6.46

5

Delhi

1165

95

8.15

Total

5585

395

7.07

Table 7 Describes the distribution of the prevalence of thrombocytopenia among patients with viral infection at various cities under study.

The study found that prevalence of thrombocytopenia among patients with viral infection at various cities for total sample of 5585, at Lakhimpur 5.00%, Panipat 8.77%, Sonipat 6.26%, Gohana 6.46%, Delhi 8.15% respectively and total prevalence of thrombocytopenia among patients with viral infection at various cities under study in North India is 7.07%.([Table 7])

The overall prevalence of causes of thrombocytopenia is represented in pie diagram.([Figure 1])

Prevalence of thrombocytopenia among Indian Patients
Figure 1 : Prevalence of thrombocytopenia among Indian Patients

Discussion

The present study aimed to study the prevalence of the thrombocytopenia among Indian patients in selected various cities at North India. The study was conducted at 5 cities are Lakhimpur, Panipat, Sonipat, Gohana and Delhi for a period of 11 month from January 2022 to November 2022 collected 22832 samples of which 1295 samples were identified with thrombocytopenia.

The present study designed showed that prevalence of the drug induced thrombocytopenia found that the prevalence is 4.7% in selected cities, these findings were similar to the study.[20], [21], [22], [23]

The present study designed identified that prevalence of the heparin induced thrombocytopenia found that the prevalence is 3.8% in India these findings were similar to the study.[2], [3], [24], [25], [26]

The present study designed found that prevalence of the neonatal thrombocytopenia is 3.4% these findings were similar to the study.[4], [5], [27]

The present study found that the prevalence of gestational thrombocytopenia is 3.4%, these findings were similar to the study.[7], [8], [9], [10]

The present study designed to assess the prevalence of the thrombocytopenia patients who were on chemotherapy drug found that the prevalence is 16.01% in selected cities, these findings were similar to the study 4% of patients with solid tumors and 16% with hematologic malignancies experienced grade 3 thrombocytopenia.[28], [29]

The present study designed to assess the prevalence of the thrombocytopenia among patients with viral infection found that the prevalence is 7.07% in selected cities, these findings were similar to the study 17.1% of HIV infected patients developed thrombocytopenia.[30]

The present study designed to assess the prevalence of the thrombocytopenia among Indian patients by studying various cities and found that the prevalence is 5.6% these findings were unique and the study identified the prevalence in North India.

Conclusion

Thrombocytopenia in short is the decreased platelets in circulating blood, the reasons for decreased thrombocytes are wide and range, the knowledge of occurrence of any cause helps in better management of patient. To which the prevalence will guide the incidence rate so that the right intervention can be practiced to prevent the complication of treatment in case of therapeutic drug or chemo drug use, the other vital events such as gestation and its relating complication helps in better care of maternal health and child, the right incidence of neonatal thrombocytopenia helps in restoring the newborn vitals and life, early and right antibiotic or antiviral drugs can prevent complication due to viral infection, the present study designed to understand the nature of prevalence of thrombocytopenia in selected cities of North India, and found that the prevalence information is important information to prevent, treat and manage thrombocytopenia. The recommend that similar prevalence should be studied in other region for early diagnosis and treatment thrombocytopenia.

Conflict of interest

There is no conflict of interest.

Source of Funding

No grant or funding for research

References

  1. James N George Richard, H Aster. Drug-induced thrombocytopenia: pathogenesis, evaluation, and management. Hematology Am Soc Hematol Educ Program 2009. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
  2. A Bloemen, MJG Testroote, MLG Janssen-Heijnen, HMJ Janzing. Incidence and diagnosis of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) in patients with traumatic injuries treated with unfractioned or low-molecular-weight heparin: a literature review. Injury 2012. [Google Scholar]
  3. I Elalamy, B Tardy Poncet, A Mulot, E De Maistre, C Pouplard, P Nguyen. Risk factors for unfavorable clinical outcome in patients with documented heparin-induced thrombocytopenia. Thromb Res 2009. [Google Scholar]
  4. HA Gebreselassie, H Getachew, A Tadesse, TN Mammo, W Kiflu, F Temesgen. Belachew Dejene Incidence and Risk Factors of Thrombocytopenia in Neonates Admitted with Surgical Disorders to Neonatal Intensive Care Unit of Tikur Anbessa Specialized Hospital: A One-Year Observational Prospective Cohort Study from a Low-Income Country. J Blood Med 2021. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
  5. F Ferrer Marin, ZJ Liu, R Gutti, M Sola-Visner. Neonatal thrombocytopenia and megakaryocytopoiesis. Semin Hematol 2010. [Google Scholar]
  6. U Perepu, L Rosenstein. Maternal thrombocytopenia in pregnancy. Proc Obstet Gynecol 2013. [Google Scholar]
  7. D Provan, R Stasi, AC Newland, VS Blanchette, P Bolton-Maggs, JB Bussel. International consensus report on the investigation and management of primary immune thrombocytopenia. Blood 2010. [Google Scholar]
  8. T Gernsheimer, AH James, R Stasi. How I treat thrombocytopenia in pregnancy. Blood 2013. [Google Scholar]
  9. RF Burrows, JG Kelton. Fetal thrombocytopenia and its relation to maternal thrombocytopenia. N Engl J Med 1993. [Google Scholar]
  10. N Nathan, I Sol, A Vincelot, D Collet, P Granchamp, E David. Is a biological assessment necessary to realize an obstetrical epidural anaesthesia in a patient whose interrogation and clinical examination are strictly normal?. Ann Fr Anesth Reanim 2007. [Google Scholar]
  11. A Hitron, D Steinke, S Sutphin, A Lawson, J Talbert, V Adams. Incidence and risk factors of clinically significant chemotherapy-induced thrombocytopenia in patients with solid tumors. J Oncol Pharm Pract 2011. [Google Scholar]
  12. MJT Berg, PMLA van den Bemt, S Shantakumar, D Bennett, EE Voest, A Huisman. Thrombocytopenia in adult cancer patients receiving cytotoxic chemotherapy: results from a retrospective hospital-based cohort study. Drug Saf 2011. [Google Scholar]
  13. Y Wu, S Aravind, G Ranganathan, A Martin, L Nalysnyk. Anemia and thrombocytopenia in patients undergoing chemotherapy for solid tumors: a descriptive study of a large outpatient oncology practice database, 2000-2007. Clin Ther 2000. [Google Scholar]
  14. GL Goldberg, DG Gibbon, HO Smith, C Devictoria, CD Runowicz, ER Burns. Clinical impact of chemotherapy-induced thrombocytopenia in patients with gynecologic cancer. J Clin Oncol 1994. [Google Scholar]
  15. H Kantarjian, F Giles, A List, R Lyons, MA Sekeres, S Pierce. The incidence and impact of thrombocytopenia in myelodysplastic syndromes. Cancer 2007. [Google Scholar]
  16. SY Liou, JM Stephens, KT Carpiuc, W Feng, MF Botteman, JW Hay. Economic burden of haematological adverse effects in cancer patients: a systematic review. Clin Drug Investig 2007. [Google Scholar]
  17. D Weycker, M Hatfield, A Grossman. Risk and consequences of chemotherapy-induced thrombocytopenia in US clinical practice. BMC Cancer 2019. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
  18. DJ Kuter. Managing thrombocytopenia associated with cancer chemotherapy. Oncology 2015. [Google Scholar]
  19. SA Sellers, RS Hagan, FG Hayden, WA Fischer. The hidden burden of influenza: A review of the extra-pulmonary complications of influenza infection. Influenza Other Respir. Influenza Other Respir Viruses 2017. [Google Scholar]
  20. T Bakchoul, I Marini, 10.1182/asheducation-2018.1.576. Drug-associated thrombocytopenia. Am Soc Hematol Educ Program 2018. [Google Scholar]
  21. DM Arnold, S Kukaswadia, I Nazi, A Esmail, L Dewar, JW Smith. A Systematic Evaluation of Laboratory Testing for Drug-Induced Immune Thrombocytopenia. J Thromb Haemost 2013. [Google Scholar]
  22. E Domingo-Chiva, M Díaz-Rangel, JÁ Monsalve-Naharro, P Cuesta-Montero, JV Catalá-Ripoll, EM García-Martínez. Ceftazidime-induced Thrombocytopenia. Rev Esp Anestesiol Reanim 2017. [Google Scholar]
  23. AV Doodnauth, S Sivakumar, Y Mulatu, E Alicea, SI Mcfarlane. Acute Severe Thrombocytopenia Event Associated with Trimethoprim/Sulfamethoxazole Use. Am J Med Case Rep 2021. [Google Scholar]
  24. TA Morris, S Castrejon, G Devendra, AC Gamst. No difference in risk for thrombocytopenia during treatment of pulmonary embolism and deep venous thrombosis with either low-molecular-weight heparin or unfractionated heparin: a metaanalysis. Chest 2007. [Google Scholar]
  25. C Ribic, W Lim, D Cook, M Crowther. Low-molecular-weight heparin thromboprophylaxis in medical-surgical critically ill patients: a systematic review. J Crit Care 2009. [Google Scholar]
  26. TE Warkentin, PA Basciano, J Knopman, RA Bernstein. Spontaneous heparin-induced thrombocytopenia syndrome: 2 new cases and a proposal for defining this disorder. Blood 2014. [Google Scholar]
  27. M Cremera, H Sallmon, PJ Kling, C Bührer, C Dame. Thrombocytopenia and platelet transfusion in the neonate. Semin Fetal Neonatal Med 2015. [Google Scholar]
  28. JL Shaw, CM Nielson, JK Park, A Marongiu, GA Soff. The incidence of thrombocytopenia in adult patients receiving chemotherapy for solid tumors or hematologic malignancies. Eur J Haematol 2021. [Google Scholar]
  29. GA Soff, J Shaw, K Kilpatrick, A Marongiu, J Park. Burden of thrombocytopenia in adult cancer patients receiving chemotherapy. J Clin Oncol 2019. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
  30. S Getawa, M Aynalem, B Bayleyegn, T Adane. The global prevalence of thrombocytopenia among HIV-infected adults: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Infect Dis 2021. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

Article Metrics

  • Visibility 6 Views
  • Downloads 5 Views
  • DOI 10.18231/j.pjms.2024.138
  • CrossMark
  • Citation
  • Received Date September 18, 2022
  • Accepted Date November 25, 2022
  • Publication Date December 21, 2024